Well…the elections are over for the most part. I have to admit, I’m glad that the political ads are over with.
I spent some time on Election Day at the Statehouse. There were no winners or losers yet. It was pretty quiet with everyone off doing their election thing.
This is a good time for me to thank the men and women who represent us, who listen, formulate, debate, and pass the laws here in Ohio. What a service they provide. And it is also important to acknowledge those people who put their names on the ballot and are willing to represent us win or loose.
Christian Scientists like me enjoy the freedoms of living in this great state. We appreciate the individuals who lead us and we respect the laws that govern us. We talk with our elected officials and support our legislators in making sure that all Ohioans, children, women, and men are fully represented and protected under the law.
As the 2010 election cycle finally draws to a close, Americans across the country are breathing a collective sigh of disgust. It has been a brutal campaign season and all those candidate’s anti-ads are finally history…at least for a week or two. Here in Ohio the pressure has been particularly intense. The New York Times reports that Ohio is the most politically important state in America. At least that is what the White House thinks. President Obama visited Cleveland just yesterday, his 12th visit to Ohio since he took office.
Negative ads have suffocated the airwaves in recent weeks with some TV stations reporting 80% of their commercial time sold to political interests. So what are we to make of all the name calling, finger pointing and misrepresentation? Aren’t we better than that?
Strategists say it works. Voters respond to negativity. I suspect it has a lot to do with the way we communicate. Speechifying today embraces nano-bites, the tiniest tad of information possible. So how can you scrutinize someone with so little information to go on? You can’t. How can answers to a multifaceted problem like health care reform be articulated in minuscule fragments? It can’t. It is much easier to denounce in 60 seconds than to make someone understand a complex issue. It is quicker to pinpoint fault than to expound virtue. Does it have to be that way?
Mary Baker Eddy never sought political office. As one of the most influential women of her time, she could have. But as the discoverer of Christian Science and founder of the Church of Christ, Scientist, she had a different role to fulfill. She could have used her clout to influence voters. But she didn’t. Her life’s work was to forward deeper understanding of God and man and to advance compassion in the human experience. Genuineness was her approach.
In addition to establishing the Christian Science Church, she founded the Christian Science Monitor to combat the misinformation that plagued the media of the early 1900’s. She, too, was sometimes the target of disinformation. Yet, she handled the attention without mudslinging. She spoke plainly, gently. Can we do that? We can.
15,000 people packed my small neighborhood yesterday, if only briefly, without even stopping to say hello. They were too busy running. Men, women and children of all shapes, sizes and ages were here giving their all in the annual Columbus Marathon. I walked down to the end of my block to cheer them on.
I live at mile-marker 5 on the challenging 26+ mile course. At that spot, some runners were gliding along effortlessly. Others plodded along in a rhythm that attested to the difficulty in having reached this point and knowing they had a long way to go. Continue reading 5 Mile Mark→
No wonder some many people are grasping their cell phones today. 3339 texts are sent and received by the average 13-to-17-year-old every month according to the Nielsen Co. as reported by the Wall Street Journal yesterday. That’s over 100 per day! Adults are also texting at an increasing rate.
According to WSJ reporter Katherine Rosman, this surge presents some interesting challenges. She writes, “A text message’s content is so condensed that it routinely fails, even more than email, to convey the writer’s tone and affect. The more we text, the greater the opportunity for misunderstanding.” Continue reading A messy, messagy world→
Writing about the connections between health, thought, and spirituality